If you’re in home care, you’ve likely experienced something similar to the following scenario:

You are in a leadership meeting where a well-intentioned decision is being finalized. The idea is simple. Any caregiver who hasn’t worked in the last 90 days will be removed from the system. It’s simple and straightforward. Let’s keep the roster clean, stay compliant, and focus on our caregivers who “actually want to work.” It makes sense, right? It feels like tightening the operations belt.

But what no one realizes is, we’re about to make this harder than it needs to be. Because if you’ve spent time in home care you know this isn’t a traditional workforce. And the moment you start managing it like one, you begin solving the wrong problems.

I’ve now seen this same decision play out across multiple organizations, in different forms, with the same unintended outcome.

Why the 90-Day Rule Fails in Home Care

In most industries, inactivity signals disengagement. In home care, inactivity often signals… life. Because life happens. School schedules change. Family responsibilities shift. Health events happen. People leave… and then, they come back.

I learned this my first week as an assistant home care coordinator. I was attempting to help the staff supervisors cover an open shift. I said, “What about Susie? Should I call her?” My question was more about whether she could cover a specific case. But the answer I got from the supervisors? “Don’t call her. She never picks up anything.” My boss had told me to call everyone. So, like the good young rule follower I was, I did. And guess what? Susie just replaced all four tires on her car and was desperate for extra money. She picked up the shift.

The mistake we often see in home care is assuming that someone who hasn’t worked in 90 days is no longer part of your workforce. They are. They’re just not scheduled right now. And when you remove them from your system, you don’t just “clean up data.”

You erase:

  • A known, vetted, onboarded caregiver
  • Someone who is already trained
  • Someone who already understands your patients
  • Someone who has already chosen you once

And most importantly, you eliminate your easiest path to filling future hours.

The Part Teams Can Miss

If you’re not engaging your inactive caregivers, someone else is. This is where the real risk shows up. Those caregivers don’t disappear. They stay licensed or certified. They stay capable. They stay in the home care market.

They just stop hearing from you. And the agency that reaches them first at the moment their life opens back up (or they need new tires) is the one that schedules that caregiver.

The Real Cost Isn’t Compliance. It’s Capacity.

We talk a lot about hiring in this industry. But we don’t talk enough about reactivation.

Every inactive caregiver represents:

  • Zero recruiting cost
  • Minimal to no onboarding friction
  • Faster time to first shift
  • Higher likelihood of retention (they’ve already said yes once)

When you remove those inactive caregivers, you’re choosing to replace low-cost capacity with high-cost recruiting. At scale, that’s not just a small mistake; It’s a costly one.

What the Best Operators Do Differently

The best operators don’t think in terms of “active” vs. “inactive.” They think in terms of engaged vs. not YET re-engaged. That’s a very different mindset.

Instead of deleting people, they build processes and systems to:

  • Stay connected consistently
  • Track credential status
  • Understand availability changes
  • Retrain or reconfirm competency
  • Reintroduce opportunities at the right moment

During my last role, our technology team understood this challenge and built engagement dashboards that monitored and reported the not yet re-engaged in real time, and quickly. If a caregiver’s schedule suddenly changed and they were working less hours, we knew it immediately so we could reach out and offer work.

Agencies that understand this win the caregivers. They know this simple truth: Today’s inactive caregiver is next week or next month’s critical shift coverage.

Why This Used to Be Hard and Why It Isn’t Anymore

Historically, re-engaging inactive staff was too manual to scale. So, teams defaulted to what felt manageable, cutting the “availability” list, or slicing it into sections that identified the caregiver’s level of engagement (ie. “Temporarily unavailable”).

Thank goodness that constraint is gone. With the right AI partner, like Arya Health, you can:

  • Continuously reach out to inactive caregivers
  • Keep credentials and compliance up to date
  • Re-engage based on life changes and availability
  • Bring people back into the schedule without friction

Instead of losing caregivers to inactivity, agencies can:

  • Increase engagement of current caregivers
  • Reclaim capacity they already built
  • Reduce dependency on constant new hiring
  • Create a more responsive, flexible workforce

And most importantly, stop starting from zero every time they need coverage.

Remember Susie? Turns out, after Susie reengaged, she also started picking up more shifts. Arya now serves as that persistent assistant home care coordinator (and “rule follower”) who has no prejudices toward inactive staff. By engaging inactive caregivers, Arya increases the reengagement and future engagement of your field staff, thus increasing capacity.

And importantly, historically, the reason most active caregivers are “terminated” or moved to “inactive” status is an expired renewable requirement, like a CPR card or license. Those caregivers are ineligible to work. If the Arya agent is doing its job, that is no longer a problem.

The Shift Leaders Need to Make

This isn’t about a policy change. It’s about an operating model shift. With Arya, we go from “only keep people who are actively working” to “continuously engage the workforce we’ve already hired.”

In home care, your workforce doesn’t disappear. It drifts and resurfaces.

Your job as a leader isn’t to clean up the availability list.

It’s to bring it back to life.

‍